Friday, November 13, 2009

Exclusive Slow Motion Videos Now Posted on YouTube


I just wanted to give all of you a head-up to check out the TennisSpeed Channel on YouTube (http://www.youtube.con.tennisspeed) because I've uploaded some interesting (super) slow motion clips of the top ATP pros from our huge slow motion video library.


Right now, there are clips of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Fernando Gonzales, Fernando Verdasco, and Ivo Karlovic (and many others to come) available for your viewing (and learning) pleasure.

If you're a regular visitor to the TennisCruz website, which is the best* tennis instructional website on the web, you've already seen samples of the kinds of slow motion footage in our vast library in some of the featured articles there.

(*For those of you who know my general opinion of online tennis instruction from previous posts, for me to come out and say the TennisCruz is the "best" online source for tennis instruction, you know that the site is something perhaps bordering on the extraordinary.

What's special about TennisCruz.com is its creator, Sergio Cruz (who was the personal coach of 4-time Grand Slam winner, Jim Courier). Sergio has been there and done that as both a player and coach in tennis, and everyone who loves the game is frankly incredibly fortunate to have someone of Sergio's knowledge and experience in the game sharing with his insight with everyone so freely.

Especially if you understand the closed, secret society that is high-performance tennis!)

And, if you're interested, the reason why we started collecting this footage is to increase our understanding and insight into the technique used by today's top players.

The clips posted on YouTube will show those players who we believe represent the "Gold Standard" when it comes to racket or court movement speed today (and in the foreseeable future).

Slow motion video (or "high speed video") has enabled us to seen a far richer, more complex and until now, mostly hidden universe that underlies the physical genius of the top players.

What we have seen in the movements of the top pros at 210 to 1200 fps ("frames per second") video has revealed new insights into the stroke (bio-)mechanics used by Federer, Nadal, and their colleauges. And these new insights have driven the development of our new biomechanical analysis tool (and service), called BVM or BioVideoMechanics (more on BVM in future posts).

BVM has enabled me to make a quantum leap in understanding of how players like Federer and Nadal move to produce "hall of fame" performance AND how to teach players to execute those very same techniques. The challenge in this process has beenn to figure out how to distill the most important discoveries from the fundamental complexity behind the Federer Forehand or the Roddick Serve--because their genius is in fact highly complex, far beyond the conventional oversimplifications and buzzwords that dominate tennis instruction today.

In coming posts, I'll show you some of the different ways that BVM can transform your game. If you're interested in finding out more about BVM and how it can help your game, send me an email at speedmaster[at]tennisspeed.com.

TTFN!

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, January 09, 2009

Change and the Power of Being "Different"

Happy New Year, Everyone!

It’s been a while since I’ve posted and let me begin by thanking all of you out there who have been following the blog and I hope that you have found the ideas and perspectives presented here interesting and useful sometimes. :)

Yes, the title of this post is a hint of what’s in store from TennisSpeed and this blog in the coming year.

There are going to be some major changes at TennisSpeed including a new website and the launch of a brand new service (tentatively called BVM, we’ll talk more about this future posts) that taps into the massive amount of new information we’ve obtained in the past 6 months about how to develop maximal power and control from your stroke technique on serves and groundstrokes.

This blog will change a bit too, as I plan to post more frequently with shorter entries with more photos and videos. I will also include some commentary and analysis of select ATP and WTA players and matches from a speed training and development perspective.

I also plan to introduce some of the really intriguing new findings about stroke techniques that we’ve uncovered using super high-speed video analysis and a novel video-based biomechanical analysis technique we’ve developed with the help of a retired, physics and engineering “superman”.

Essentially, what these new discoveries have been telling us is that if you want to perform at a world-class level, you need to focus solely on how to reproduce the stroke techniques used by the top players and essentially be willing ignore (or block out) virtually all conventional tennis instruction—especially when it comes to serves and groundstrokes.

If you look carefully, the top performers, the great champions have always performed in ways that went against the grain of virtually all of the dominant instructional ideas of their playing careers. They did things in ways that were considered by the tennis experts of their respective days to be either outright “wrong” or completely idiosyncratic in that only that player could execute that stroke (during their active playing careers).

What’s also true is that there is an optimal technique—an optimal movement—to execute every stroke, yet, there is still room for the “evolution” of these “optimal” techniques by an exceptional athlete.

From Lacoste and Tilden, to Budge, Hoad, Kramer and Laver, to Borg, Lendl, Becker, Agassi, Sampras, and now Federer and Nadal, the greats of this sport have almost always done things differently than those before them. The greats of any endeavor, of any “field”, separate themselves by doing things differently, not by “following the masses” and doing what even the most respected or famous experts say they “should be doing”.

For example, if you wanted to “follow” the path that Nadal took to the top, what you will find is that Nadal developed in a way that the great majority of so-called experts in US tennis believe is flat-out wrong. Our “experts” mainly dismiss his success as being unique to his specific circumstances and impossible to reproduce in general.

Truth is, having seen, met and worked with some of Nadal’s inner circle team, I will tell you that what he did to develop into a top player is completely logical and totally reproducible, just not in America. And, if you’re wondering, it has everything to do with character and family values (Yes, they matter! Big time!) as it does with superior training knowledge and methods.

At this point in history, as far as I can tell, US tennis is really incapable of developing a player of Nadal’s (or Federer’s) caliber given the type of people involved in tennis in general, as well as given who’s “in charge” of tennis right now. And when you look at the few recent exceptions who have broken through (esp. Sam Querrey), you will find out that these players did not conform to the commonly accepted “standards and practices” of US high-performance tennis, and found their own way, often going (far) "against the grain".

So, yes, if you haven’t figured it out already (or if you’re reading this blog for the first time), I have zero confidence in US tennis, especially when it comes to its ability to develop top players. Without a complete "re-start" of the tennis establishment here, I only expect more of the same: a random trickling of successful American tour pros.

Now, to show you that I will do more than complain, I want to offer you a few potential solutions. Here’s the most practical advice I can offer you today:

1) Hire a really expert tennis coach (there are only a few around on Earth; you can email me for a list of these individuals--fair warning, only a very few individuals on this list live in the US!)
2) Spend time training and playing tournaments in either Spain or France
3) Be completely skeptical, if not outright suspicious about all “free” tennis instruction that appears in the mass media—especially on the internet.

IMHO, most, if not all “free” tennis instruction on the web is worth exactly the price you’ve paid for it—i.e. absolutely nothing.

At least the videos they post are pretty good, but often they're no better than some of the vids you can find on Y**T**e (I really like the tennis vids posted by the user named "worldted"). Many of these websites have what I would call "entertainment value" (this is why I look at them), but frankly I just don't expect them to have any valuable instructional insights.

These sites are well-intentioned by and large, but simply lack the competence and insight that you could actually use to reproduce what you see in their images of ATP and WTA tour pros.

Better yet, ignore all free tennis instruction unless you are satisfied with information that will get you to maybe NTRP 4.5 max. Then realize that the NTRP of even a decent NCAA D3 player is between 5.0 to 6.0 (yes, really). So, if you choose to rely on the info that’s presented on sites like T*****P*****r.net, H*T*** T****s, W*bT*****s.net, F**.com, T*****O*e, etc. to mold your game, you absolutely won't improve beyond NTRP 4.5. What this means is authentic "high-performance" in tennis (i.e. NTRP > 5.5) will be impossible for you to EVER achieve, even if you did have the will, interest and talent to do so.

Finally, I wanted to just tell you upfront that your feedback is always welcome here. Please feel free to comment or even email me directly with your feedback anytime.

I have been wondering lately about why I’ve received relatively little feedback about what the contents of my posts since it's been around. Then it dawns on me that many of the ideas I’ve presented so far are either completely novel or fundamentally contrary to the vast majority of tennis instructional and training concepts that are familiar to American players, coaches, parents and fans.

So to a great extent, I conclude that many of you need to take some time to consider these ideas and opinions yourself before you might consider responding.

Or, maybe, I need to tap more often into my "inner provocateur" and see where this takes us…

TTFN!

Labels: , , ,

Friday, March 21, 2008

TennisSpeed visits Europe-Part 1

March has been an interesting time for me as I traveled across the Atlantic for the first time without my “boss” and children for companionship and translation.

I was invited to make a presentation about our work with the SpeedChain in tennis at a special, one day seminar (on March 1st) exploring the frontiers of high-performance tennis development that was organized by the Tennis Education Group based in Palma de Mallorca, Spain (yes, that Mallorca that’s home to Carlos Moya and Rafael Nadal).

Tennis Education Group is the brainchild of Spanish Federation Coach, Jofre Porta, whose mission is to help bring to light the best and most advanced methods, concepts and techniques involved in training and developing world-class tennis players. Jofre also founded his own tennis academy based in Palma de Mallorca together with Moya called Global Tennis Team.

For those of you who don’t know who Jofre Porta is, he has already had a remarkably successful coaching career, as he is the man who coached Carlos Moya from the juniors to becoming the French Open Champion in 1998, all the way to helping Moya become the #1 player in the world in 1999. Jofre also played a critical role in coaching Rafael Nadal in his formative years (between the ages 8 to 17). Jofre was in charge of helping Nadal getting established on the right foot as a professional (he appears in the "No Strings" episode featuring Nadal), and even today, although he no longer travels very much on the tour, he continues to coach Moya from behind the scenes from their academy in Mallorca.

IMHO, Jofre is one of the best, if not the best tennis coach on the planet without question. His knowledge, wisdom and experience are virtually unmatched…
The combination of his intelligence, intensity, creativity, curiosity, open-mindedness, honesty and passion for the game, and his genuine interest and concern for the well-being of his players separates him from the other, perhaps more “famous” coaches at the pro level.

Let’s put it to you this way, how many other coaches do you know have taken not just one, but two players all the way from the juniors to Grand Slam Champion? I cannot think of anyone but Jofre who has accomplished this incredible feat in recent memory…

Being Jofre’s guest at his academy gave me the opportunity to see his coaching philosophies and methodology in action on a daily basis. And what I saw I can only really describe in these terms: it was as if I was looking into a crystal ball and seeing what the sport would look like, say, 5 to 7 years in the future. Jofre is training his players to play the sport of the future, not the past like it’s done in most tennis nations, including ours.

It’s not that you wouldn’t recognize existing or established drills and training exercises in their training system—it’s how they are integrated and executed in the context of Jofre’s vision of the tennis of the future that was nothing short of well, genius. Add to that mix Jofre’s own unending curiosity, creativity and openness to new ideas—he is constantly searching for any and all ideas that will help his players develop the skills necessary to compete at the sport’s highest levels—and he and his team have developed novel drills and exercises, on and off-court that exist nowhere but at Global Tennis.

And now, the SpeedChain is in the process of being integrated into the “Global System”, as the SpeedChain training device and training methodology fits seamlessly into one of the most fundamental training principles and goals of Porta’s vision of high-performance tennis: to maximize a player’s capacity to generate speed, acceleration and power in all facets of their physical game.

Jofre told me that the SpeedChain will enable him to break through many of the existing barriers and limitations of current training and conditioning methods and he sees the benefits of training of the SpeedChain extending well beyond increasing a player’s speed and power to helping train and develop, among other things, an athlete’s kinesthetic sense, proprioceptive capacity, balance, coordination, anaerobic fitness and other fundamental athletic skills and attributes.

Anyway, it was a fantastic stay for me at Global Tennis…

There were many hours of stimulating discussion with the coaching team at Global as well as with the other speakers invited to the seminar (including a leading Spanish exercise physiologist, and one of Spain’s leading sports psychologists, as well as Jofre and his head physical trainer, Pedro Zierof), and it was truly a privilege to be a part of what's happening at the “cutting edge” of tennis coaching and training.

What I learned in those 6 short days in Palma has fundamentally changed many of my own ideas about coaching tennis, and how to train and develop a high-performance player. (We’ll get into the details of those changes in future posts). The open exchange of ideas and knowledge between everyone was something that I will remember for a very long time, especially considering the “culture of secrecy” that generally prevails at the highest levels of the sport.

And, you can’t imagine how honored I felt to have Jofre tell me that I would always be welcome in the world of Global Tennis.

More stories, photos, and info from Europe to come…

TTFN!

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Radar Guns 101

In this post, we’ll move forward from our ongoing discussion of talking about stroke speeds (or the lack of stroke speed, as the case may be) at the various levels of US Tennis to talking about a more basic issue: how to properly measure your stroke speeds in the first place.

The first thing you need to do is to measure your stroke speeds accurately. To measure your stroke speeds accurately, you need to get your hands on a good quality radar gun and understand how to use it properly.

Over the past two years, I’ve had the opportunity to use a large variety of radar guns from every price point that’s currently available from the under-$100 “budget” guns (i.e. Bushnell Speedster II) to the $1,400+ high-end guns from JUGS and Stalker. What I’ve learned from using these guns is that as long as you’re willing to spend at around $200 to $300 for a mid-price radar gun, there isn’t a noticeable difference in performance among the various brands, or between guns from different (i.e. higher) price points.

The price for radar guns is more-or-less open ended, and the more you pay, the more features you can get (direct download of data to your laptop, software analysis for the downloaded data, etc.). But the features that are available in the mid-range guns are more than enough for the purpose of getting accurate stroke speed measurements.

In my experience, you will only run into problems if you go the “budget” route and buy the lower-end guns such as the SpeedTrac/SpeedChek (the little black radar box you place in front of the net) or the Bushnell Speedster guns. The SpeedTrac/SpeedChek has improved since its original introduction in the mid-1990s, but when I use the SpeedTrac/SpeedChek side-by-side with a trusted mid-range or high-end radar gun, there is way too much difference in the measurements between the SpeedTrac/SpeedChek and say, the typical mid-range radar gun for me to trust the readouts of the SpeedTrac/SpeedChek.

IHMO, say no to the SpeedTrac/SpeedChek in all its incarnations because who knows what it’s measuring.

Likewise, I haven’t had a good experience using either the Bushnell Speedster guns—either one, Speedster I or II. The problem for me with Speedster I was that it couldn’t measure speeds over about 105 MPH very accurately (which doesn't fly when you work with high level competitive players who can serve over 110 MPH) and of course, when I read the “fine print” of the Speedster I specs, sure enough, it said that the measurement range topped out at 105 to 110 MPH for tennis.

Speedster II supposedly possesses improved technology compared with its ancestor, but still doesn’t seem to measure speeds over 110 MPH with great consistency or accuracy.

Therefore… IMHO, say no to the Speedster as well until further notice.

So, what radar gun do I recommend that performs without going overboard with either price or features?

The radar gun that I’ve found that has the best combination of performance and price/value is a relatively new introduction to the radar gun market called the Tracer SRA-3000 radar gun manufactured by Sports Radar, Ltd. (Homosassa, FL).

In side-by-side measurements with my high-end Decatur radar gun and a friend’s brand-new JUGS R1005, the Tracer, Decatur and JUGS guns perform identically when it comes to accuracy and consistency. The biggest difference between these two radar guns is that the Tracer is cordless (it runs on 6 AAA batteries!), and is much lighter than the Decatur (my Decatur is corded to a rechargeable battery stored in its carrying case).

The other difference between the Tracer and the Decatur and JUGS guns is the price. You can get a Tracer for around $180 retail, whereas the Decatur and JUGS guns will run you a minimum of $700 retail (new). That’s around a $500 difference in price for a radar gun that performs to the level of the “luxury” guns.

The performance and value of the Tracer that I’ve experienced is the reason why we decided to offer it for sale on the TennisSpeed website. It performs at a high level for a great price. What more can you ask for from any product?

OK, so now you have some idea about what the various radar guns on the market offer… So now you may be wondering how to use that radar gun to measure your stroke speeds.

Using the radar gun to get accurate stroke speed measurements is straightforward enough…

1. Mount the radar gun on a tripod (make sure you have a tripod mount on your gun… The Tracer has one, does yours?) to ensure that the gun itself is consistently aligned for each measurement—this makes for the most consistent measurements.

2. To get the most accurate measurements on groundstrokes, place the radar gun behind the contact point and place the tripod in straight line behind the intended flight of the shot. Make sure to set the height of the radar gun at the intended contact height of the stroke (i.e. if you intend to make contact at waist height, make sure the gun is also set on the tripod at waist height).

Therefore, if you want to measure the speed of your down-the-line forehand, a simple way to check that you’ve placed the radar gun in a straight line directly behind the path of the shot is to point the radar gun toward the area of the court where the forehand will land (Figure 1).




Figure 1. Radar gun positioning for down-the-line forehand (gun positioned in a straight line behind the path of the shot).

3. To get the most accurate speed measurements for your serve, set the height of the gun as high as your tripod allows. Place the tripod behind you in the same line as your hitting shoulder. Similar to the speed measurement for your groundstrokes, align the radar gun itself in a straight line directly behind the intended flight of your serve to obtain the most accurate measurement (Figure 2).

So, if you want to measure the speed of your slice serve, a simple way to check that you’ve placed the radar gun in a straight line directly behind the path of the shot is to point the radar gun toward the area of the service box where the serve will land in the service box.



Figure 2. Radar gun positioning for slice serve (gun positioned in a straight line behind the path of the shot).

When you follow these 3 simple steps, measuring your stroke speeds becomes a breeze.

Maybe now you are wondering about which strokes should you be measuring…

I have been measuring maximal serve and groundstroke speeds for my players in the same way the WTA measures its players to create its “Power Index”. I have been measuring maximal (and average) forehand, backhand, first serve, second serve and overhead speeds (of balls hit into play, of course!) in both training and live matches.

I have also been measuring so-called “rally speeds” where I measure the ball speeds during “neutral” groundstroke rallies (neither player is in an attacking or defensive mode/position). The “rally speed” of a player tells me a lot about what tactical options are available to a given player. And yes, there is a great difference in rally speed when comparing the various levels of competitive tennis from juniors and high school varsity tennis to college and professional tennis.

The difference in “rally speed” is quite similar (among US players) to the differences in serve speed that we’ve been talking about at some length in recent posts. That is, there is about a 25 to 30 MPH difference in rally speed between juniors and professional players.

To sum it up, go get your hands on a decent radar gun and remove all of the myth and mystery from your game. Measure your stroke speeds and create your own “speed profile”: average speed of your fastest forehand, backhand, first serve, second serve and overhead. Now you have a way to compare yourself to other players with known speed profiles to see where you really stack up…

Then, measure your “rally speed”, and when you finally look at the numbers… It will be a number that probably won't be keeping Roger, Rafa and Andy awake at night.

Don’t be surprised when you find out that your speed profile is well, more like a “slow profile”. Get it?

Starting with my next post, we’ll be getting into what you all have been waiting for…

We’ll start talking about how to increase the speed of the various strokes from a technical and conditioning perspective. And I’ll begin talking to you about one of the special projects I’ve been working on recently that has truly blockbuster potential in changing the way tennis technique is taught by coaches and learned by players.

So stay tuned…

TTFN!

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Court Movement 103

In this post, we’ll continue our series on increasing the speed (and efficiency) of your court movement by having a brief discussion of how to hit efficiently while on the run.

First, let 's define what I mean by "hitting on the run"…

What I am talking about is situations during play where you have to move—sprint, that is—more than three or four steps before you can form a hitting stance to strike your shot. In general, we are talking about playing situations where you may be:

  • Reacting to a shot where your opponent changes the direction of your return (e.g. your opponent hits your crosscourt return down the line or vice-versa)

  • Retrieving shots that your opponent aggressively drives into the deep corners in response to your own soft or short returns

  • Retrieving drop shots, drop volleys, or, if you are playing Federer, low, short slice shots that land in the service boxes when you are positioned well behind (> 5 feet) the baseline.

In these situations, you maybe forced to cover a very large distance (perhaps as much as the entire half of the court to return a drop shot, or the entire distance along the baseline from one doubles alley to the other to retrieve a well-struck forehand) in very short time in order to make any contact, much less effective contact, with the ball.

And, many times the total reaction time you have to make contact in those “emergency” situations won’t allow you to set up completely to make your shot… You might only have enough time to set one, rather than both feet in an improvised hitting stance from which to accelerate to ball contact.

Of course, the ideal way to “hit on the move” is to move fast enough to “win that race” with your opponent’s return and set up completely—i.e. set both feet firmly on the court—for a clean, controlled strike.

But, what if you can only move fast enough to achieve a “tie” in that race to the ball, where you will arrive only at the last possible moment to make an effective stroke? What then?

In that case, there are three critical moves you must make to hit effectively while on the dead run:

1) Make your initial steps to the ball as explosive as possible.

· First, lower your center of gravity using your split-step.

· Second, turn your hips and shoulders in the direction of the ball, and start moving toward the ball using the leg that’s closest to the ball (if you need to move to your right, “step out” with your right leg and vice-versa), and pump your arms powerfully in your initial move to the ball.

2) After you’re about halfway there, stop pumping your arms and immediately finish your backswing such that the only move you’ll make with your hands and upper body is to accelerate the racket forward to contact.

3) Swing forward very aggressively to contact a split second after you make your last step with your back foot.

You need to be very aggressive with your forward swing because you are fighting somewhat all of the momentum you’ve generated by moving explosively toward the ball. Effectively, your feet are propelling you in one direction, and you are trying to swing with your hands and arms against the direction of the momentum of your lower body by swinging to make (solid) contact with the ball. So you need to aggressively accelerate towards contact.

These are the three core moves you must make to hit effectively while on the run.

Now, you might ask the question: what do I do after finishing my stroke?

On what foot should I land after making contact? What’s the quickest way to begin my recovery for my opponent’s next return?

The answer to the former question is, quite frankly, “it depends”. There isn’t a single, optimal foot to finish on. The foot which you land on depends mainly on the type of shot you chose to execute on the run (i.e. a deep, hard drive, or a high and heavy looping return, or a sharp crosscourt angle return). You could land on either foot really… It's really a matter of personal "style".

Although I will point out to you that players who can consistently generate a sharp (fast) crosscourt angle return on the run tend to land on their front foot (see Federer, Roger and Sampras, Pete), while players who are adept at hitting high, heavy and deep topspin returns while on the run often land on their back foot first, with their front leg held in the air (see Nadal, Rafael).

Likewise, if you want to produce a return with a lower, “driving” trajectory (rather than a higher, more looping trajectory), landing on your front foot after contact has been the preferred method of accomplished tennis millionaires throughout the history of the sport.

(Hmmm… “Accomplished Tennis Millionaires” or “ATMs”… That acronym is a keeper. See the connection? “ATMs”, as in, receive tons of cash money in return by playing tennis in a certain way. :) )

The answer to the latter question is simply, “sit down” or “step out” on your back leg, and immediate push back toward the center of the court with the same leg. So, if you landed on your front foot, immediately after the front foot makes contact with the ground, use your back leg to stop and push hard back toward the center of the court. Likewise, if you landed on your back leg, immediately begin moving toward the center of the court using the same leg.

Notice that I am not trying to explain in any fine-grain detail about how to perform the exact movements required to make the initial moves toward the ball or how to recover. Other than telling you which leg (right or left) to use to initiate an efficient movement sequence, the fine details of how to execute an effective running shot (total number of steps, how big are the steps, how fast to pump the arms, the final speed needed to reach the ball to make contact, etc.), and how well you can execute your running shots may vary infinitely from situation to situation and from player to player because all of this is solely dependent on your own innate athletic ability.

AND, as athletic ability ranges so widely even among elite tennis players (i.e. the difference between Federer’s apparent ability to “glide” from shot to shot versus Roddick’s sometimes heavy-footed, “stomping” action), it’s virtually impossible to give a very detailed description, much less an “exact” description of the movement themselves beyond describing the optimal way to initiate the movement itself.

All that’s really possible is to describe the principles involved, and leave it to each player to execute the necessary movements in their own unique way. There is indeed a “science” to all athletic skills, but in the end, the execution of those skills ultimately represents the “artistry” of the player him/herself.

And that “artistry” is yet another element that explains why so many of us are so fascinated by this great sport.

So, to review the key principles of hitting effectively on the (full) run:

1) Make your initial steps to the ball as explosive as possible.

2) After you’re about halfway there, stop pumping your arms and immediately finish your backswing such that the only move you’ll make with your hands and upper body is to accelerate the racket forward to contact.

and,

3) Swing forward to contact a split second after you make your last step with your back foot.

TTFN!

P.S. For those of you that still have trouble grasping this idea of how speed is the defining element of tennis success, just look at the singles players who made the Final 4 at Flushing Meadow.

Final 4 Men: Federer, Djokovic, Davydenko, and Ferrer

Final 4 Women: Henin, Kuznetsova, Williams, and Chakvetadze

All 8 players possess the necessary foot and racket speed to either out-run their opponents or out-hit them.

What’s interesting among the group is that both the Men’s (Federer and Djokovic) and Women’s finalists (Henin and Kuznetsova) hit with the most spin from among the original group of 8…

What does this mean? The take-home message is that the 4 finalists not only generated the fastest strokes (from serves to groundstrokes), but they also maximized their control over their strokes through their higher spin production.

These 4 players achieved both maximum power (ball speed) and control of their strokes.

In other words, they get to "have their cake and eat it too"... Which , BTW, for those who may be keeping track , the "cake" that Roger gets to enjoy is worth, in real terms:


  • 500 ATP ranking points (the maximum possible for winning a single tournament--compare that massive points windfall to the winner of an entry level pro singles tournament, who is typicially overjoyed to earn an astronomical 12 ranking points ), and

  • $1.4 MILLION in prize money as the US Open singles champion (compare this amount to the $1,200 earned by the singles winner of a $10,000--that means 10K in total prize money, people--Futures tournament.)


As you can see, there's a lot of valuable "cake" out there for players to enjoy...






Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,